So, below is an article written by Neil McEvoy AM about the current progress with Parental Alienation within the Family Justice System. Now after reading this article I am disappointed by a few things and I need to say my piece about it. The first thing is the team that formed The Parental Alienation Task Force is the Dear Sophie Team, so please let’s not exclude or forget the hard work they have done! The second issue is this “Sir Stephen also emphasized the focus on early intervention and deflecting the less conflicted cases away from the door of the Court, which was at the heart of his proposal for the creation of a Supporting Separating Families Alliance. This Alliance is one of the key planks in his Private Law proposals for the President of the Family Court Division”
This seems sneakily suspicious in my eyes and very similar to the organisation that I am setting up, yet I have had no contact from any of the MP’s or government representatives with regards to this. I am not interested in glory hunters but when people are out there working hard and raising awareness, even to the point of setting up organisations to genuinely help and support people and then try and rip off the idea. This is unacceptable and quick frankly rude, I am always trying to meet and discuss how my organisation can help and support the government. Yet no one has contacted me with regards to it, very disappointed with these developments.
This campaign is not for self-promotion or career progression, when it comes to Parental Alienation is a serious issue and needs to be treated as such.
I also found this comment online with regards to this article
Somewhat confused here.
When I read this post that you have put out yesterday 10th October, regarding your meeting with Cobb, my first reaction was “wow!!, finally someone is achieving. Your article indicated great progress.
However it has been brought to my attention, that this meeting took place 2-3 months ago (July 24th) and that promises that Cobb made, he has since reneged upon, by the exclusion of you from a meeting with the family review panel, that he promised you would get the opportunity to attend.
I have to ask the question, why are you posting this on the 10th October? This indicates that this is current news and misleads readers into false hope.
I am sure you understand my confusion.”
Article Posted below –
The ongoing campaign to tackle the issue of Parental Alienation moved forward again last week. Following on from a previous meeting with the Justice Minister Paul Maynard MP, a group of cross-party politicians and campaigners; Neil McEvoy AM, Ivan Lewis MP and Andrew Bridgen MP, met with Sir Stephen Cobb – High Court Judge in the Family Division to discuss Parental Alienation. Sir Stephen is a member of the Ministry of Justice Safeguarding Inquiry Panel [i] and the architect of the latest proposals from the President of the Family Division[ii] – Sir Andrew McFarlane – on Private Law.
Post by neiljmcevoy.
A pre-meeting of the delegation had identified a number of important issues that impacted on the Family Justice system
Courts must recognise parental alienation as a real issue
The MoJ inquiry panel membership failed to cover all perspectives –with no representation from Wales OR from organisations working with men – particularly those experiencing domestic abuse
False allegations continue to cause concern
All forms of domestic abuse must be addressed including coercive control, which is a component of Parental Alienation.
The meeting with Sir Stephen Cobb took place in the Royal Courts of Justice and explored all of the points on the agenda. The campaign group shared a strong message with a solutions focused approach that places the child first and intervenes at the earliest point to protect children from being abused and ‘turned’ against an otherwise good and loving parent or grandparent. There was much agreement between all parties of the need for early intervention and of the harm to children, their parents and the wider family – from poorly resolved and protracted Court involvement.
The meeting also addressed the problem that Parental Alienation is not adequately defined in the way that – for example – domestic violence and abuse has been. Parallels with the way that Courts deal with domestic violence were explored with one possibility being the issuing of a Practice Direction to Courts to ensure consistency.
Post by neiljmcevoy.
Sir Stephen was prepared to acknowledge that he had seen ‘alienating behaviours’ in his own practice as a barrister and latterly Family Court judge, and agreed that the time was ripe for more action on Parental Alienation than had taken place in the past. Sir Stephen also emphasized the focus on early intervention and deflecting the less conflicted cases away from the door of the Court, which was at the heart of his proposal for the creation of a Supporting Separating Families Alliance. This Alliance is one of the key planks in his Private Law proposals for the President of the Family Court Division.
International comparisons about the treatment and recognition of parental alienation were discussed – including the criminalisation of this form of abuse in some countries such as Brazil, Mexico and Israel.
Much still needs to be done to ensure that children and families are protected from the insidious form of abuse that is Parental Alienation. Even when Courts act to tackle the abuse Orders are often ignored or twisted by the controlling parent which undermines the child/parent relationship and causes many parents to give up in despair when they see no way to resolve matters. Enforcement of Court Orders continues to be a problem, with less than 1% of applications ending in an Order for enforcement. Sir Stephen had also seen this as a key issue, as it was one of the areas that he’s covered in his proposals for the President. He stated that around 30% of cases coming to Court were returning ones which will need to be dealt with on a new ‘pathway’ to improve the way these cases are dealt with.
Neil McEvoy Assembly Member for South Wales Central in the National Assembly for Wales stated:
“It was a useful meeting with Sir Stephen where we were able to put across the reality of parental alienation that I see so much of in my constituency casework. I welcomed the fact that Sir Stephen had recognised alienation directly in his work as a senior judge.
“There is much more that needs to be done and I’m now keen to ensure that helpful words from the judiciary turn into serious actions to improve a failing Justice system for all parents – but most importantly for the children who are rightly paramount in these matters.”